No bones in the pellets?

After posting John Blakeman's essay about hawk castings yesterday, I took another look at Lincoln's photo of the "pellets"  and promptly sent the following note to the Ohio hawk expert:
John: What are all those sticking-out things in Lincoln's pellet photos if not bones?
He answered within an hour:
Marie,
 John: What are all those sticking-out things in Lincoln's pellet photos if not bones?
He answered within an hour:
Marie,
    The white strips are actually the bases of small  feather shafts. Most of them have had the thin feather filaments separated by  the digestive enzymes. The feathers aren't totally digested, but the   thinner filaments do get weakened and break off. The thicker feather bases  come out as shown. Yes, they can look like little bone fragments, but they are  really feather shaft fragments. 
     Again, pigeons have lots of body feathers, and  those made most of the white casting fragments.
     But what about that big white thing on the bottom  of the casting on the right? Sure looks like a bone.
     It's not. It's almost surely a small pebble, a bit  smaller than a pea. It was probably in the stomach of the pigeon, deliberately  ingested by the bird to assist physical digestion. Many larger seed-eating birds  actually require these "gastroliths," "stomach-stones."
     The hawk has no revulsion in swallowing stones like  this. We aren't really sure if wild Red-tails ever deliberately swallow small  stones. They might. Falconers for ages have known that trained hawks and falcons  will often swallow provided gravel. In granivorous (seed-eating) birds, the  stomach stones act as teeth, grinding ingested seeds in the gizzard. Just what  ingested stones do for raptors is not really known. But falconers have known  that their trained hawks often fly better, hunt better,  and just act  better after swallowing these stones. 
     Falconers call these swallowed stones "rangle."  Personally, I've never offered rangle to my falconry Red-tail, Savanna, so I  have no personal experience with this. But there is a good deal of this in the  falconry literature.
     One last note on raptor castings. As repulsive as  these might appear, they are innately clean, almost sterile. Powerful digestive  enzymes have chemically degraded stomach and crop bacteria. We raptor biologists  delight in finding these. They accurately reveal the hawk's meals of the  previous day, down to exact species. By carefully pulling these apart and  comparing the included feathers and fur with known prey species, we can know  exactly what the hawk ate the previous day. This is how we can be sure that  Red-tails don't spend much time hunting or taking "desirable" species. In  Central Park, it's mostly pigeons, rats, and squirrels, as shown in these  castings. Out here in the Ohio countryside, it's almost exclusively field voles,  small lemming-like rodents.
     However, sometimes we encounter a hawk that's  eating something else, revealed by its castings. An example is my falconry  hawk herself, Savanna. When I trapped her eight years ago, in autumn, in her  first year, I immediately noted that she was pretty thin. The next day, her  first in captivity, she put up a casting made entirely of grasshopper  exoskeletons. The poor bird just wasn't finding any field voles and was trying  to subsist on grasshoppers. Had I not taken her into captivity, she would have  surely died a few days or weeks later. 
 --John Blakeman
 


<< Home